UNHCR

RECENT POSTS

Report: The world’s poorest countries host the most refugees

Photo by Internews Network/Flickr (Creative Commons)

A refugees camp on the Libya-Tunisia border, March 2011

Today is World Refugee Day, and to mark it, the office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has released a report detailing where people displaced from their native countries by war, famine, political upheaval and other crises have sought shelter.

And while growing resettlement demand is anticipated here from unrest in the Middle East and North Africa, the bulk are being hosted by countries far poorer than the United States.

In fact, a full 80 percent of the world’s refugees have been absorbed by developing countries, according to UNHCR’s 2010 Global Trends report. Some of the world’s poorest countries are hosting enormous refugee populations, “both in absolute terms and in relation to the size of their economies.”

According to the report, Pakistan, Iran and Syria (where many Iraqis fleeing the war took refuge) have the largest refugee populations at 1.9 million, 1.1 million and 1 million respectively.

To illustrate the dearth of resources in these nations for displaced populations: Pakistan has 710 refugees for each U.S. dollar of its per capita GDP (Gross Domestic Product); Germany, by comparison, has 17 refugees for each dollar of per capita GDP. (Germany is the industrialized country with the largest refugee population, not the United States.) More from the report:

The 2010 Global Trends report shows that 43.7 million people are now displaced worldwide – roughly equalling the entire populations of Colombia or South Korea, or of Scandinavia and Sri Lanka combined. Within this total are 15.4 million refugees (10.55 million under UNHCR’s care and 4.82 million registered with the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees), 27.5 million people displaced within their own country by conflict, and nearly 850,000 asylum-seekers, nearly one fifth of them in South Africa alone.

Particularly distressing are the 15,500 asylum applications by unaccompanied or separated children, most of them Somali or Afghan. The report does not cover displacement seen during 2011, including from Libya, Côte d’Ivoire and Syria.

Displacement from North Africa as people flee the conflict in Libya has reached a crisis point, with some desperate migrants making a perilous crossing by sea to Italy. Among those being displaced in Libya are refugees from other countries who had sought shelter there, according to the U.S. State Department, and some have been referred for resettlement in the U.S. I covered this and other refugee issues during a recent segment on KPCC’s Madeleine Brand Show.

A recent report from the Migration Policy Institute described how the upheaval of the “Arab Spring” in the Middle East and North Africa is and isn’t affecting migration at this point.

Will the U.S. see more refugees from unrest in the Middle East?

Photo by syriana2011/Flickr (Creative Commons)

Protesters in Damascus, Syria, April 2011

A video series on Multi-American this week is featuring the stories of Southern California immigrants from Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen and Syria, all of them coping in their own way with the political upheaval taking place in their native countries.

But what about their loved ones and others back home, those directly affected by violence and instability, especially in conflict zones like Libya? Will more of them be coming to the United States as refugees?

Officials from both the U.S. State Department and the United Nations agency that handles refugees have said that they have not seen a notable increase in nationals of those countries affected by what has become known as the “Arab Spring” seeking to come to the U.S. as refugees. However, the agencies are seeing resettlement demand among people who were already refugees, particularly in Libya, who are being displaced once more by the conflict there.

A report from the Migration Policy Institute this week described how the unrest in the Middle East is and isn’t affecting migration at this point:

What immediate impact the revolts have had on emigration from migrant-sending states is unclear but, at the time of writing, a scenario of mass migration in response to political unrest seems unlikely.

So far, only Tunisia has experienced a surge of emigration, with some 25,000 irregular migrants having landed on the southern Italian island of Lampedusa in the first three months of 2011. In Egypt, Syria, and Yemen, no similar movement has occurred, and the topic of emigration has simply disappeared from the mainstream media.

What makes Tunisia special is the proximity of Europe (giving would-be migrants the impression — the wrong impression, as it happens — that the Italian shore is within reach); a common border with Libya from where waves of migrants are currently fleeing the war; and a dramatic wish to emigrate that predated the revolt.

What refugee agencies have noticed In predominantly migrant-receiving states, it is not the outcomes of the revolts that will most impact migration, but instead the immediate reality of the protests themselves and their repression by states.

When the revolt first broke out in Libya in mid-February 2011, the country was host to 1 million or more migrants mainly from Egypt, Tunisia, and sub-Saharan Africa. As of May 5, a recorded 720,609 migrants have fled insecurity in the country as a result of the revolt, the vast majority crossing Libya’s land borders with Tunisia and Egypt.

The scenario of the First Gulf War between 1990 and 1991, during which time 3 million migrant workers and their families were suddenly driven into exile, is being repeated in Libya.

Continue reading