Obama

RECENT POSTS

Will Obama’s support of same-sex marriage cost him Latino votes?

Photo by darcyandkat/Flickr (Creative Commons)

That’s become one of the burning questions since yesterday’s announcement by President Obama that he believes same-sex couples should have the right to marry, made a day after North Carolina legislators voted to outlaw same-sex marriage in their state.

Obama’s announcement itself wasn’t tied to any particular legislation, but it’s been characterized as a political gamble in an election year. And some of the speculation has since moved to how such a statement from Obama will resonate in November with Latino voters, whose votes helped propel him to victory in 2008 – and who tend, at least as far as first-generation immigrants go, to be on the socially conservative side.

In the end, Obama’s announcement may have less of an effect on Latino voters (and on black voters, also divided on same-sex marriage) than some might think now. The election is six months away, and recent polls suggest that Latinos are far more concerned with issues like the economy and jobs than with same-sex marriage, birth control, even immigration. Still, it’s worth digging into some of the recent data.

Last month, the National Council of La Raza and Social Science Research Solutions, a public opinion research firm, released the results of a survey which suggested Latinos are not as unaccepting of homosexuality, or even of same-sex marriage, as perceived to be. Fifty-four percent of those surveyed supported same-sex marriage, and 64 percent supported civil unions.

That said, there are some big differences within this population: Latinos who are deeply religious are less tolerant of homosexuality, as it goes with the general population. Their level of acculturation matters as well, with those less acculturated to the U.S. also less tolerant.

Even among the religious there are differences, with Latino Protestants and non-Catholics who identify as “Christian” more likely to oppose same-sex marriage than Catholics. A chart from the report:

Source: National Council of La Raza/Social Science Research Solutions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As far as acculturation goes, the attitudes of immigrants from Latin America, where being “out” as a homosexual is still taboo in many places, seem to mellow with time and exposure:

It could very well be the case that the reason the unacculturated are intolerant is because gay and lesbians are less upfront themselves in their “home country;” As Hispanics live longer in the U.S., the more they stumble across LGBT issues, and more importantly, LGBT themselves. Our data corroborate with other data that the more one comes into contact with LGBT, the more tolerant they become.

A survey of Latino voters from last November released by Univision and the polling firm Latino Decisions found similar attitudes. According to those results, 43 percent of Latinos polled overall said that same-sex couples should be allowed to marry; 13 percent agreed with civil unions.

But in addition to the predictable splits along party lines (47 percent of Democrats for same-sex marriage, 22 percent of Republicans against), there were significant generational and cultural differences. For example, only 28 percent of the foreign-born Latino voters polled said they backed same-sex marriage, as opposed to 54 percent of those born in the U.S.

Overall, though, the numbers skew toward general support. The San Francisco Chronicle interviewed Latino Decisions principal and Stanford professor Gary Segura today as to whether Obama’s announcement would cost him among Latino and black voters in November:

That possibility is “is wildly unlikely,” said Gary Segura, professor of American Politics and Chicano Studies at Stanford University and a principal in the polling firm Latino Decisions.

While many Latinos are Catholic, a religion which does not condone same sex marriage, Segura said Latinos rarely let their religious beliefs steer their votes.

…As for African-Americans, who now support the president by a ration of roughly 9 to 1, Segura said, “it’s hard to believe that they are going to not support the first African-American president” because of something unrelated to the economy or race.

And there is that – the economy. It’s a top-of-mind concern for Latinos and other minorities that eclipses other key issues, including immigration. So much so that Republican strategists have been pushing it as a way for GOP nominee-apparent Mitt Romney to make much-needed inroads with Latino voters, having been unable to get close on immigration.

In a recent general voter survey, the Pew Research Center ranked the economy at the top of 18 key issues for voters; same-sex marriage placed at the bottom, and immigration not much higher. Come November, it could all boil down to the words of James Carville two decades ago.

Perhaps the savviest quip I’ve seen today relating to Obama’s announcement was in a Washington Post story that quoted Stu Rothenberg, editor of the nonpartisan Rothenberg Political Report:

“There will be a lot of talk, a lot of huffing and puffing from both sides in the next 48 hours, but the election is still about jobs and the economy — not gay marriage,” he said.

With Latinos still reeling from the economic downturn, there’s a good chance that for them, the same will hold true.

Obama’s immigration reform talk: More yawns than cheers?

Last night during his State of the Union speech, President Obama spoke, as he has before, about the need for comprehensive immigration reform. He also brought up, if not by name, the Dream Act, long-proposed legislation that would grant conditional legal status to undocumented young people who arrived in the U.S. before age 16 if they attend college or join the military.

“Send me a law that gives then the chance to earn their citizenship,” Obama said. “I will sign it right away.” But by and large, Obama’s statements regarding immigration didn’t draw much excitement. Here are a few snippets of reaction from media and elsewhere.

The immigration portion of the speech was nothing we haven’t heard before, wrote Elise Foley in the Huffington Post:

When President Obama’s immigration policy staffers gathered to help pen the State of the Union Address passage dedicated to their issue, they didn’t have much to work with. Comprehensive immigration reform never came close, and the Dream Act failed. What’s a speechwriter to do?

Control-C. Control-V.

“I believe as strongly as ever that we should take on illegal immigration,” Obama said in his Tuesday evening speech.

Indeed, he “strongly believe[d] that we should take on, once and for all, the issue of illegal immigration” last year, according to his State of the Union speech.

A CNN opinion piece posted shortly before the speech last night, written by Lanae Erickson of the left-leaning policy think tank Third Way, predicted what might occur when immigration came up:

Count on it. President Obama will devote three sentences to immigration reform in the State of the Union.

Two dozen lawmakers will jump to their feet and applaud. One-third of the audience will give an obligatory clap. The rest will sit silently, stifling a yawn.

Five years ago, comprehensive immigration reform legislation seemed possible and deeply bipartisan. Now it seems as unlikely and distant as President Bush’s mission to Mars.

The Washington Post’s Ezra Klein didn’t get specifically into immigration in his Wonkblog today, but had this to say:

Last night’s State of the Union will not take a place alongside Barack Obama’s 2008 speech on race. It won’t be mentioned in the same breath as his 2004 speech in Boston. It didn’t even have the intellectual scope and narrative sweep of his 2011 speech in Osawatomie, Kansas.

Rather, it was a laundry list of policies, along the lines of the State of the Unions Bill Clinton delivered late in his presidency. Which makes perfect sense. Obama is staffed by much of the same team that wrote those State of the Unions.

And more along these lines, in different words, from Victor Landa at News Taco:

He can afford to play from his base because the opposition has left the filed open. So he reiterated many of the Democratic points and positions that he’s been hitting for three years (immigration, homeowner relief, student loans, etc…), and strike a note toward the center by saying what the American citizenry has been saying all along — Washington is broken.

How did some of those young immigrants who stand to benefit from the legislation Obama was talking about react? Not with much enthusiasm, either. Obama’s track record has included record deportations and tightened interior enforcement, which among other things has eroded his Latino support as the November election gets closer. An undocumented student activist group called Dream Team Los Angeles had this line in its statement today:

The President must not blame “election year politics” for four years of inaction and political unwillingness to stand with the immigrant community that helped elect him.

Angelica Salas, director of the advocacy group Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights, reacted similarly in another statement:

Although conciliatory in words, the President’s immigration policy remains at a stand-still while the massive and ever-expanding deportation machine is well oiled and humming along. The reform he promised to see through during the first year of his first term is now given short shrift as he outlines his priorities during its last.

At the same time, the president did set himself aside from his Republican competitors, whose own tone on immigration has not been winning over disenchanted Obama supporters. Candidate Mitt Romney has vowed to veto the Dream Act and most recently talked about encouraging “self-deportation,” while his chief rival Newt Gingrich, initially more lenient and favoring a path to citizenship for some, has shifted positions during the campaign. Gingrich most recently said he’d favor a military version of the Dream Act, without a college component.