NCLR

RECENT POSTS

Report: Latinos are more LGBT tolerant than we think

Source: NCLR/Social Science Research Solutions

As conventional wisdom goes, Latinos are not the most tolerant group when it comes to accepting homosexuality. But this is more perception than reality, a new report says.

The National Council of La Raza and Social Science Research Solutions, a public opinion research firm, have released a survey suggesting that Latinos are not as unaccepting of LGBT peers or even of same-sex marriage as perceived to be, although those who are deeply religious are less tolerant, similar to the general population. And surprisingly, while the acculturation level of immigrants are plays a part, the level of tolerance doesn’t vary so much between first-generation immigrants and U.S.-born Latinos. From the report:

With regard to support for legal gay marriage, Gallup has been tracking support within the overall U.S. population since 1996. They most recently found that 53 percent of Americans support legal gay 0% marriage. This compares quite nicely with our data on Hispanics, for whom 54 percent offered their support.

We found strong support for other policies as well in our data. Sixty-four percent of Latinos support civil unions. No less than 83 percent of Latinos support legal protections for hate crimes, job discrimination, housing discrimination, as well as support for healthcare and pension benefits for gay and lesbian couples. Over three out of four (78 %) support open military service.

That said, it’s impossible to generalize, as the children of immigrants who have tried to come out can relate. In a Q&A last year about coming out twice – as gay and undocumented – political artist Julio Salgado described his own family’s attitudes. While his mother was immediately accepting, he’s had to tread carefully with other family members:

In my case, I have never told either one of my grandmothers that I am gay. Specially my father’s mom, who truly believes that homosexuality can be cured by reading a pamphlet.

As I get older, I have learned to respect her beliefs. I have come to understand that she comes from a different generation. Even my father, who still struggles with the idea of me being queer, has sort of come around because I’ve given him that space to try and understand what is like to have a gay son.

The NCLR report describes the acculturation aspect:

It could very well be the case that the reason the unacculturated are intolerant is because gay and lesbians are less upfront themselves in their “home country;” As Hispanics live longer in the U.S., the more they stumble across LGBT issues, and more importantly, LGBT themselves. Our data corroborate with other data that the more one comes into contact with LGBT, the more tolerant they become.

Generationally, Latinos also become generally less religious beyond the first generation, according to the report, and less Catholic. However:

Interestingly, there are not differences in the attitudes of Latinos across generations. Fifty-nine percent of first generation Latinos support legal gay marriage, compared to 55 percent of third generation Latinos. The difference in support of legal unions is significant (59% traditional versus 67% acculturated), but is still relatively small.

The entire report can be downloaded here.

NCLR’s Janet Murguía: ‘A few nonpartisan dos and don’ts for aspiring candidates’

Photo by nathangibbs/Flickr (Creative Commons)

Given the rocky start that one presidential hopeful in Texas had yesterday, making a dud of a tequila joke before a room full of Latinos, the timing for an insider’s guide to the Latino vote couldn’t be better.

The Hill’s Congress Blog published the guide today, written by National Council of La Raza president Janet Murguía. And while it doesn’t go so far as to advise against tasteless jokes, it covers the basics: Take Latino voters and their concerns seriously, especially immigration; engage them and don’t take them for granted; don’t demonize them, because they’ll vote against you. An excerpt:

Don’t write off the Latino vote. Candidates who believe that Hispanics are part of any party’s base are under a grave misapprehension. While it is true that most Hispanics are registered Democrats, history also shows that most are frequent ticket-splitters. Both President Ronald Reagan and President George W. Bush received more than 40 percent of the Hispanic vote in their reelection campaigns.

Some analysts note that a Republican needs to receive 40 percent of the Latino vote to win the presidency. In fact, for many candidates in 2010, failing to engage the Latino voter cost them the election. So those who appeal to Latino voters early stand a better chance of ending strong.

While accounting for only 6.9 percent of all voters, Latinos made up a larger share of the electorate last year than in any previous midterm election. Recent polls have ranked immigration as a top policy issue among these voters.

Quote of the moment: NCLR’s Martinez De Castro on what motivates Latino voters

Photo by Joe Hall/Flickr (Creative Commons)

A multilingual sign points the way to a polling place, November 2006

“Much has been made about Latino enthusiasm around voting on Tuesday, suggesting that low enthusiasm means ‘not voting.’ Well, here’s the thing: I am voting on Tuesday, but I would hardly describe my mood as ‘enthusiastic.’

“All to say that there are different factors vying for Latino attention–some could dampen participation, some could energize it–and the way that candidates define themselves on the issues makes a difference to those energy levels.”

- Clarissa Martinez De Castro, director of immigration and national campaigns for the National Council of La Raza, in the Huffington Post

Martinez’s opinion piece made the Twitter rounds this weekend. In it she wrote about about the varied perceptions of Latino voters as either a) a solid voting block, aligned on issues and focused chiefly on immigration (which they are not); b) no different than the rest of the electorate, without common interests (which they are also not).

She took issue with media coverage of some recent surveys of Latino voters, including reports from the Pew Hispanic Center that have pointed to low voter motivation among Latinos and a division among Latino voters on issues that include what to do about the nation’s undocumented immigrant population.

Martinez wrote: “Since immigration does not traditionally top the priority list (although it has reached number one in several polls this year), some pundits say that Latinos do not care about immigration. Wrong again. Immigration–when it’s part of the political debate–serves as a litmus test by which Latinos assess how candidates or parties look at their community.”

Examples of immigration as litmus test abound in this election year, among them an erosion of Latino support for the Meg Whitman campaign in part by the candidate’s handling of the “housekeepergate” scandal involving Whitman and her undocumented ex-maid, Nicandra Diaz Santillan.

Ads seen as overtly anti-immigrant that have been produced by some candidates’ campaigns have not won over Latino voters, either.

Reader “jessepluna” posted this comment beneath Martinez’s essay:

I think Latinos know they have a bull’s eye target on their backs and will vote in greater numbers than during a typical midterm election.