Muslim Public Affairs Council

RECENT POSTS

Hate crime or not, why the killing of Shaima Alawadi carries special weight

Screen shot from msnbc.com

Shaima Alawadi

Police have yet to determine if the murder of Shaima Alwadi, a 32-year-old Iraqi American mother of five who was beaten to death last week, is indeed a hate crime. Alawadi died last Saturday of head injuries after enduring a brutal beating a few days earlier in her El Cajon, Calif. home, which appeared broken into; a note that family members found next to her read something along the lines of “go back to your country, you terrorist,” as her daughter told media.

Her family said it was the second note of this kind they had found in a week. Alawadi’s death is being investigated as a possible hate crime, but police haven’t drawn any conclusions. Meanwhile, El Cajon’s large Iraqi immigrant community is shaken, and the murder has resonated internationally.

Coming a month after the death of Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old unarmed black boy shot by a neighborhood watch volunteer in Florida, Alawadi’s murder has drawn comparisons to that killing. There has been other violence against Muslims in the U.S. over the last decade, even against people perceived to be Muslim, like Indian Sikhs. But for a number of reasons, Alawadi’s murder carries special weight for Muslims and Arab Americans. In this Q&A, Salam Al-Marayti of the Muslim Public Affairs Council in Los Angeles provides his take on why.

M-A: Shaima Alawadi’s murder seems to be resonating in a way that other violence against Muslims (and some non-Muslims, like Sikhs) has not. What can you tell us about the public reaction, and the weight this particular act of violence carries?

Al-Marayati: Number one, the brutality of the incident, in terms of murdering a young woman who is a refugee from somewhere else, from persecution in a place where violence was seen every day. She left Iraq in 1993, so she probably witnessed attacks by Sadaam’s forces. I can recount the stories of people trying to make sense of something so senseless, as was happening in Iraq. And now the same senselessness has happened here. People cannot make sense of the brutal murder of a young woman who is leaving behind five children.

And because of what has been happening politically in terms of the attitudes against Islam and Muslims, this incident was really a spark that has triggered so many concerns. Leaving the note that the culprit left definitely reeked of a hate crime, and that is the perception at this point, though we don’t know what transpired in that living room and we have to await the final report from law enforcement.

M-A: This happened against a backdrop of growing concern from Muslims, as anti-Muslim hate crimes have ticked up in recent years; last fall, the FBI reported an increase in anti-Muslim bias incidents between 2009 and 2010, from 107 to 160. And while these make up only a fraction of overall hate crimes, there’s a sense of unease. What kind of incidents are typically being seen?

Al-Marayati: Generally what we’re seeing is, number one, vandalism against mosques, places where Muslims would be congregating. And harassment against someone that is perceived to be Muslim, though they may not be Muslim themselves, like a Sikh or a Latino or African American.

There is definitely this rise in bullying against young kids, elementary school kids, and that has definitely spiked in the last couple of years. I can’t pinpoint what incidents took place to trigger that, but it is happening. Many parents, mothers and fathers, are very concerned about the identity formation of their children now. Teachers, superintendents of schools and parent-teacher associations need to be made aware of this.

M-A: Where does political discourse fit into the current climate? There have been the Muslim hearings held by Rep. Peter King, for example, among other things. And why is this happening now?

Al-Marayati: Animosity against Muslims in the United States is increasing, and you can see it in two ways. Number one, when someone questions the allegiance of Muslims in a candidates’ debate (as Herman Cain did last year), they use Muslims as a punching bag. Several presidential candidates have said they would not appoint a Muslim to their cabinet, and there has been silence to that. The silence in and of itself is very troubling. (When someone referred to President Obama as a Muslim in front of Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich), Gingrich didn’t say anything.

Then in 2008 John McCain said that he’s not, he’s a good guy. The whole national discourse on Islam has been reduced to such ridiculous levels.

Continue reading

Q&A: A Los Angeles Muslim community leader on the damage bin Laden caused U.S. Muslims

Salam Al-Marayati, photo courtesy of MPAC

The terrorist attacks orchestrated by Osama bin Laden affected all Americans, but they affected American Muslims in a unique way. One of the groups that has called for greater tolerance in the face of anti-Muslim sentiment and tried to clear up misperceptions is the Muslim Public Affairs Council, which has offices in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.

The group’s president, Salam Al-Marayati, addressed via e-mail today a few questions relating to the damaging effects that bin Laden’s actions had on Muslims in this country, and what the future may hold now that he’s gone.

M-A: The attacks of 9/11 affected everyone, but can you tell me in particular how these actions changed the way in which American Muslims live during this past decade?

Al-Marayati: We have many young Muslims who have either grown up with 9/11 impacting their identity or were born after 9/11. As a result, our image in the U.S. is dependent on the perception of how secure our nation is. With more insecurity comes anti-Muslim sentiment.

M-A: Do what degree do U.S. Muslims (and others, such as Sikhs) live in fear today as a result?

Al-Marayati: I wouldn’t say fear is a driver, but more alienation and psychological ghettoization.

M-A: How have Muslims been affected not only by policies such as the Patriot Act, but by public perceptions and/or discrimination?

Al-Marayati: Tremendously, since it only reinforces the perception that Muslims are a problem in our society, either a victim or a villain.

M-A: Do you think that the death of bin Laden will have any effect, or do you think this community will subject to more of this for some time still?

Al-Marayati: We hope it is the mark of an end to a dark era and an ushering in of a new era for mutual understanding in U.S.-Muslim world relations. With the rise of democracy in the Middle East and the descent of Al-Qaeda, there is an opportunity for partnership between people in the Muslim world and in the U.S. We can’t expect our governments to address issues involving culture and religion. It involves people-to-people dynamics.

‘The right to choose how we dress:’ American Muslim women speak out on French burqa ban

Photo by Siobhán Silke/Flickr (Creative Commons)

Kenza Drider, one of the most vocal opponents of France's burqa ban, April 2011

On Monday, France implemented a controversial ban on the face-covering veils worn by some Muslim women, which are referred to there as burqa or niqab. Women who continue to wear the veils are subject to steep fines if cited. The French government defends the ban as promoting sexual equality, while critics have called it a blatant appeal to anti-Muslim voters. Meanwhile, there has been mixed reaction from Muslim women as the ban is debated around the world.

KPCC intern Yasmin Nouh, a recent graduate of UC Irvine who herself is Muslim and wears hijab, the traditional head scarf, interviewed three prominent Muslim women in California on reaction to the ban. She spoke with Hadeer Soliman, vice president of the Muslim Student Union at UC Irvine; Edina Lekovic, director of policy and programming for the Muslim Public Affairs Council in Los Angeles; and Zahra Billoo, executive director of the San Francisco Bay Area chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Here’s what they had to say about the burqa ban, how it affects Muslim women here, and broader concerns they see surrounding it.

Q: What has the reaction been amongst Muslim women that you interact with regarding the new law?

Hadeer: The reaction amongst Muslim women varies, but I think a common sentiment is that this law denies women in France the right to choose what to wear. The new law will not create a “moderate” Islam, as some French officials claim it will; rather, it alienates and and infringes on the rights of a significant portion of the French population.

Edina: The vast majority of Muslim women I know are wholly against burqas or niqabs because they have no religious foundation in the Quran. They’re based on a hyper-strict interpretation of the Quran, not on what it says in the text at all. That said, they uniformly oppose the French government’s decision to ban them because it sends a completely counterproductive message to French Muslims and French society.

Banning burqas – just like banning books – will only make them more popular as a symbol of resistance. If the goal is to encourage integration of Muslim immigrants into French society, creating opportunities for participation and empowerment is the answer, not excluding and fining people based on how they dress.

Zahra: Many of the Muslim women I have spoken to about the new law are concerned. The general sentiment is that women should have the right to choose what to wear, be it as little or as much as they please. This law, under the guise of protecting and liberating them, actually harms women.

Continue reading

Quotes of the moment: Muslims on NPR’s Williams incident as a teachable moment

Photo by HORIZON/Flickr (Creative Commons)

The interior of a mosque in Ishafan, Iran, May 2006

“We need to use this moment as a catalyst to open a national debate about the grievous misconceptions, fear and suspicion about Islam and Muslims. This discussion needs to be elevated to ethical discourse beyond biases and prejudices.”

- Salam Al-Marayati, president of the Muslim Public Affairs Council in Los Angeles, on NPR’s dismissal of Juan Williams

The reaction from Muslim civil rights groups to the network’s firing of veteran journalist and news analyst Williams last week – and his comment about Muslims that led up to it – has been varied, with some taking a more forgiving attitude than others.

Williams remarked last week during an appearance on Fox’s “The O’Reilly Factor” that getting on a plane and seeing people in “Muslim garb” made him nervous. In reaction, the national Council on American-Islamic Relations issued a statement calling on called on Muslim Americans and the general public to contact NPR and “take appropriate action.”

Following Williams’ termination, the Muslim Public Affairs Council issued a statement taking a different tack, calling his dismissal “a mistake” and seeking to turn the incident into a teachable moment, with Al-Marayati sending a letter to Williams calling for a meeting “order to advance the public discourse on Islamophobia in America.”

In a post today on the MuslimMatters.org blog, Paul “Iesa” Galloway analyzed both groups’ reactions to Williams’ comment and its consequences, and what the best approach from the Muslim community might be. He wrote:

The sooner that the Muslim community understands that peoples’ fear of us needs to be dealt constructively and with something beyond just calling it bigotry the better. As a community we need to promote ways to help people overcome these false fears about us.

Was Juan Williams’ admission of fear a teachable moment that was missed?

Answers to some of the questions swirling around mosque controversies

mosque

Photo by HORIZON/Flickr (Creative Commons)

The interior of a mosque in Ishafan, Iran, May 2006

The Huffington Post featured an interesting Q & A yesterday with Salam Al Marayati, president of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, which has offices in Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.

Al Marayati (also a member of KPCC’s regional advisory council) addresses some of the questions and fears swirling around the so-called “Ground Zero mosque” in New York and related controversies elsewhere, including in Temecula, where some residents have protested against the development of an Islamic cultural center and mosque near a Baptist church.

Among the topics he addresses: Islamic law, national security, and terrorism. From the interview:

Q: What about Sharia (Islamic law) in the U.S.?

A: If what you mean by Sharia is what is practiced in the Muslim world — no! Many Muslims fled the Muslim world because of corrupt regimes, injustice, misogyny, and downright discourtesy…When we see stoning of women in Afghanistan or Nigeria, or child marriages in the Arabian Peninsula, that is not Sharia. It is an exploitation of Islam to oppress people, especially women.

Q: Is terrorism ever justified?

A: No. Terrorism is evil…Yet, when terrorists tape video messages from the caves of Afghanistan or the jungles of Somalia, they get free publicity in all US markets. When we condemn terrorism, it is barely recognized.

It’s a good read, insightful and timely.