Meg Whitman

RECENT POSTS

An exception for ‘the help’ in an anti-illegal immigration bill: good, bad, or ugly reality?

Photo by Bulent Yusef/Flickr (Creative Commons)

A detail from a mural in London, June 2006

An anti-illegal immigration bill introduced recently in Texas proposing tough state sanctions against employers who hire unauthorized workers makes an exception: It’s okay to hire an undocumented maid, gardener, or other employee “for the purpose of obtaining labor or other work to be performed exclusively or primarily at a single-family residence.”

Since its introduction late last month, its sponsor state Rep. Debbie Riddle, who is known for having a particularly tough-on-immigration stance (and perhaps best for the term “terror babies”), has received a fair amount of criticism and perhaps an equal share of ridicule, while others have praised her for being realistic.

After all, as evidenced by the undocumented housekeeper scandal that helped derail the campaign of California gubernatorial hopeful Meg Whitman last fall, few Americans are immune from the underground economy. The proposed Texas law threatens to punish employers with up to two years in prison and a $10,000 fine, so including those who hire domestic help as offenders could mean a lot of Texans in hot water, no doubt a few politicos among them.

Several blogs have posted takes on Riddle’s bill, HB 2012. The Latino Politics Blog hinted at a much-criticized “in their place” element that some detractors see in the bill:

So what does this tell you about the Longhorn State? Well, it tells me a few things: 1) it is recognized that undocumented people take some jobs that regular Americans, even unemployed Americans, won’t take and 2) Texas legislators expect those sin papeles to do the menial work while the state’s senators at the federal level rejected the passionate pleas of DREAM Act youth who could contribute above the manual labor wage level and pay into the system with better paying jobs and taxes.

Continue reading

Quote of the moment: NCLR’s Martinez De Castro on what motivates Latino voters

Photo by Joe Hall/Flickr (Creative Commons)

A multilingual sign points the way to a polling place, November 2006

“Much has been made about Latino enthusiasm around voting on Tuesday, suggesting that low enthusiasm means ‘not voting.’ Well, here’s the thing: I am voting on Tuesday, but I would hardly describe my mood as ‘enthusiastic.’

“All to say that there are different factors vying for Latino attention–some could dampen participation, some could energize it–and the way that candidates define themselves on the issues makes a difference to those energy levels.”

- Clarissa Martinez De Castro, director of immigration and national campaigns for the National Council of La Raza, in the Huffington Post

Martinez’s opinion piece made the Twitter rounds this weekend. In it she wrote about about the varied perceptions of Latino voters as either a) a solid voting block, aligned on issues and focused chiefly on immigration (which they are not); b) no different than the rest of the electorate, without common interests (which they are also not).

She took issue with media coverage of some recent surveys of Latino voters, including reports from the Pew Hispanic Center that have pointed to low voter motivation among Latinos and a division among Latino voters on issues that include what to do about the nation’s undocumented immigrant population.

Martinez wrote: “Since immigration does not traditionally top the priority list (although it has reached number one in several polls this year), some pundits say that Latinos do not care about immigration. Wrong again. Immigration–when it’s part of the political debate–serves as a litmus test by which Latinos assess how candidates or parties look at their community.”

Examples of immigration as litmus test abound in this election year, among them an erosion of Latino support for the Meg Whitman campaign in part by the candidate’s handling of the “housekeepergate” scandal involving Whitman and her undocumented ex-maid, Nicandra Diaz Santillan.

Ads seen as overtly anti-immigrant that have been produced by some candidates’ campaigns have not won over Latino voters, either.

Reader “jessepluna” posted this comment beneath Martinez’s essay:

I think Latinos know they have a bull’s eye target on their backs and will vote in greater numbers than during a typical midterm election.

Quote of the moment: Meg Whitman on why ex-housekeeper should be deported

“Well, the answer is: It breaks my heart, but she should be deported, because she forged documents and she lied about her immigration status.”

- Meg Whitman, Republican candidate for governor, regarding her former maid Nicandra Diaz Santillan in an interview last night with Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren

Whitman’s remark was in response to a direct question from Van Susteren while discussing her former housekeeper, Nicandra Diaz Santillan. “Should she be deported?” Van Susteren asked.

The scandal that erupted last month over Whitman’s employing Diaz, an undocumented immigrant, for nine years then firing her last year after deciding to run for governor has threatened to derail her campaign against Democratic candidate and state Attorney General Jerry Brown, causing her to lose ground in particular among Latino voters.

Diaz came out in late September about her former employer and her immigration status during a press conference with Los Angeles attorney Gloria Allred, revealing that she been working for Whitman’s family illegally and that she was fired in June 2009 after she approached the family to ask for help gaining legal status.

The Whitman campaign has referred to it as a political smear tactic. The family hired Diaz through an agency, and Whitman has insisted she did not know that Diaz was here illegally until she told her, in spite of a Social Security Administration no-match letter that would have raised a red flag.

Whitman, the former CEO of eBay, has referred to Diaz in media interviews as having been “a part of our extended family.”

In yesterday’s interview, Whitman continued after answering: “…and it breaks my heart. Gloria Allred pulled off a political stunt, and you know what, on November third, no one is going to care about Nicky Diaz. But the law is the law…”

A short piece in the Huffington Post has the video clip from Fox.

The ten (or eleven) political races in which the Latino vote may count the most

Photo by Terry Chay/Flickr (Creative Commons)

At a polling place in San Francisco, November 2008

Because everyone loves a good list, here’s an interesting one that the San Francisco Chronicle posted today on its politics blog: The 10 political races in which the Latino vote will be decisive this Nov. 2.

At the top of the list is the Nevada senate race, in which Democratic incumbent and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is running against Republican challenger Sharron Angle. Two California races also made the list, including the race for the 47th Congressional District in Orange County in which Rep. Loretta Sanchez, a Democrat, is up against Republican rival Van Tran, a Vietnamese-American member of the state assembly.

Also on the list is the California senate race. From the post:

Republican Carly Fiorina narrowly trails incumbent Sen. Barbara Boxer in the latest polls. Boxer is counting on strong support from the state’s sizable Mexican-American population to put her over the top on Election Day. Boxer may benefit from a Latino backlash against Republicans following gubernatorial nominee Meg Whitman’s controversy over hiring — and firing — a housekeeper who was in the country illegally.

Oddly missing from the list, though, is the California governor’s race, in which a lack of Latino support could sink Republican candidate Meg Whitman in her race against former governor and present state Attorney General Jerry Brown.

Earlier this week, the Chronicle reported on the results of a new poll that showed Whitman trailing Brown among all voters in the wake of a scandal last month involving her employment and subsequent firing of Nicandra Diaz Santillan, an undocumented housekeeper that she employed for nine years. Specifically regarding the housekeeper situation, two-thirds of Latino respondents said Whitman “didn’t handle it well,” according to the story.

This week the Whitman campaign unveiled a new Spanish-language ad in which the candidate tells voters that “she stood up against” Arizona’s SB 1070 anti-illegal immigration law.