Illegal immigration

RECENT POSTS

Illegal immigration from Mexico is down, but legal immigration isn’t

Photo by Nathan Gibbs/Flickr (Creative Commons)

A family looks north into the United States from Playas de Tijuana, January 2009

In a short piece in The Atlantic today, Council on Foreign Relations fellow Shannon K. O’Neill points out that as net migration to the U.S. from Mexico has dropped sharply in recent years, there’s an interesting wrinkle to the northbound migration that continues.

While illegal immigration from Mexico to the U.S. has decreased, legal immigration from Mexico is holding steady. And compared with the level of unauthorized vs. authorized migration from Mexico a decade ago, the percentage of those coming legally is way up. O’Neill writes:

Another migratory change has also occurred: of the Mexicans that still come to the United States, many more do so legally. At the start of the twenty-first century, less than 10 percent came with papers. A decade later, it is 50 percent.

What the piece links to is a lengthy U.S. State Department list of immigrant visas issued at foreign service posts abroad. The numbers bear it out: In 2000, there were 68, 412 U.S. immigrant visas issued to Mexicans at consular posts in Mexico; in 2010, there were 65,621.

Source: Pew Research Center

These numbers have fluctuated in the years in between, but not to the same degree as has illegal immigration, the bulk of it from Mexico. While it’s never been an exact measure, the number of reported U.S. Border Patrol apprehensions of migrants from Mexico peaked most recently in 2000 at more than 1.6 million arrests, dipped, then went up a bit again in the middle of the last decade. Since then, it has been steadily on the decline.

The majority of the U.S. immigrant visas being issued in Mexico are family reunification visas, O’Neill writes, although others come on H-visas for work, from skilled workers to farm labor. The number of those coming from Mexico on E-2 NAFTA visas for investors and business interests has doubled since 2000, she writes; also going up is the number of Mexicans arriving on EB-5 visas, entrepreneur visas which require a minimum $500,000 investment in a U.S. business and the creation of jobs.

Will it change the conversation about immigration from Mexico? Perhaps not immediately. Polls still suggest that perceptions in the U.S. about the border, illegal immigration, and immigration in general don’t reflect the current reality seen in the numbers. But it’s food for thought.

Net migration from Mexico has stopped – now what?

Source: Pew Hispanic Center

The largest wave of migration to the United States from any single country in the nation’s history appears to be over. For now, at least.

Today, the Pew Hispanic Center released a report that puts together years of U.S. and Mexican data and corroborates earlier news reports that Mexican immigrants aren’t only coming to the United States in far lesser numbers, but that some are leaving, too. And that together, these two trends have brought overall Mexican migration to the U.S. to a net standstill. From the report:

The net standstill in Mexican-U.S. migration flows is the result of two opposite trend lines that have converged in recent years. During the five-year period from 2005 to 2010, a total of 1.4 million Mexicans immigrated to the United States, down by more than half from the 3 million who had done so in the five- year period of 1995 to 2000.

Meantime, the number of Mexicans and their children who moved from the U.S. to Mexico between 2005 and 2010 rose to 1.4 million, roughly double the number who had done so in the five- year period a decade before.

While it is not possible to say so with certainty, the trend lines within this latest five-year period suggest that return flow to Mexico probably exceeded the inflow from Mexico during the past year or two.

Which is a very big deal. Approximately 30 percent of all current U.S. immigrants – 12 million people altogether – were born in Mexico, according to Pew. In terms of sheer numbers, if not percentage, the wave of immigration from Mexico that occurred in the last century far exceeded that from any country in U.S. history, even from Ireland and Germany in the 19th century.

The factors for the drop-off are broader than one might suspect, and immigration enforcement isn’t at the top of the list. The Mexican census numbers cited tally returns from the U.S. between 2005 to 2010, during the worst of the recession in the U.S., but before strict measures like Arizona’s SB 1070 and other state laws that encouraged “self-deportation.”

The overall result appears to be that of many factors, among them the weak U.S. economy (and the particularly hard-hit construction sector), tighter border enforcement, rising deportations, and the increasingly risky clandestine trip across the border. South of the border, factors include a long-term decline in Mexico’s birth rate that has resulted in fewer young people of peak migration age, along with improving economic conditions in Mexico.

Of the estimated 1.4 million people who have left the U.S. for Mexico since 2005 (including about 300,000 U.S.-born children) most did so voluntarily, according to the report. But data suggests that rising deportations may play a role also: Estimates based on government data from both the U.S. and Mexico suggest that 5 percent to 35 percent may not have returned voluntarily. Also interesting is Mexican data that suggests a growing number of deportees don’t wish to return to the United States after being sent back, more than in previous years.

So what next? The trend may or may not last, depending on the U.S. economy, which could still bring back Mexican job seekers if and when it rebounds. But if they don’t come back in big enough numbers, it could leave U.S. employers in some sectors accustomed to low-wage help in a bind, much as farm employers have been left in states like Alabama and Georgia, where strict new immigration laws have prompted many undocumented immigrants to leave the state.

The Christian Science Monitor reported on this recently:

The shrinking labor pool already is having an impact in agricultural fields scattered throughout the US, some say. For example, a University of Georgia report projects that, when 2011 figures are tallied, the state economy will show a $391 million loss due to farm labor shortages. Georgia is one of several states that – following Arizona’s footsteps – recently passed laws aimed at illegal immigration.

Farmers across the country are experiencing near-term crop losses and scaling back operations, confirms Libby Whitley, president of Mid-Atlantic Solutions in Lovingston, Va. Her company handles visa applications for 600 employers who use temporary legal workers, mostly from Mexico. In the more than a dozen states that require businesses to confirm employment eligibility through the Internet-based federal program E-Verify, employers are in a corner. “The employers just really don’t have an option,” Ms. Whitley says. She adds that the farm labor workforce is 75 percent illegal.

The labor market would eventually adapt, but things could get complicated in some sectors, possibly prompting the need for temporary worker visas, which are available to employers but which many still refuse to use because of the cost and red tape involved.

The slowdown in Mexican migration doesn’t mean that the U.S.-born Mexican American population is getting any smaller, though. That population continues to grow, according to the report. So has the number of legal immigrants from Mexico. While undocumented immigrants from Mexico decreased from around 7 million in 2007 to to 6.1 million last year, there was a slight increase in authorized immigrants from Mexico, from 5.6 million in 2007 to 5.8 million last year.

The complete Pew report charts the historic migration from Mexico to the U.S. during the 20th century and its equally historic slowdown. It can be downloaded here.

Illegal immigration is down, so why do we keep talking like it isn’t?

Photo by The Pope/Flickr (Creative Commons)

A new stretch of border fence, February 2009

A new Gallup poll shows that nearly two out of every three Americans is “dissatisfied with the level of immigration into the country,” and that 42 percent want it to decrease. And yet it already has.

The poll results come a little more than a month after Homeland Security officials announced that the arrests of undocumented immigrants caught crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally have dipped to a historic low, a level not seen since the early 1970s.

And while the stats recorded by the U.S. Border Patrol aren’t perfect, combined with other research, they point to illegal immigration now being down to a mere trickle. In 2000, the agency apprehended 1.6 million people at the border; only 327,577 were caught in fiscal year 2011.

So what gives? The Gallup poll, the results of which were released yesterday, doesn’t distinguish between legal and illegal immigration, but chances are it’s the latter that respondents continue to be upset about. From the poll results:

Further, 53% in June 2011 said it was extremely important that the government take steps to halt the flow of illegal immigrants into the U.S.

The poll results show a slight decline in Americans’ dissatisfaction with immigration levels in recent years, but the numbers still indicate a different reality. While the results don’t delve into what might be happening, here’s a good hint from the report of one possibility:

…immigration could become an election issue, because the majority of Republicans and conservatives are dissatisfied and in favor of less immigration. Most independents and Democrats are dissatisfied with the level of immigration and generally tilt toward decreased immigration.

Illegal immigration to the U.S. has been on the wane for years now, the product of hard economic times in the U.S. and tighter enforcement. Yet one might not know it from the ongoing talk of illegal immigration as the 2012 presidential race moves forward, along with ample press coverage of what GOP candidates have had to say about it. Could this be clouding the news from the border? Herman Cain’s electrified border fence crack aside, here’s what front-runner Mitt Romney said this week during the candidates’ debate in South Carolina:

“But to protect our legal immigration system, we have got to protect our borders and stop the flood of illegal immigration,” Romney said.

James Rosen described the phenomenon this way recently in the Miami Herald:

When it comes to illegal immigration, Republican presidential candidates are talking like it’s 1999.

Listening to the GOP White House aspirants, voters might not know that the number of illegal immigrants in the United States is down, attempted border crossings are at a 40-year low and President Barack Obama has deported undocumented workers at twice the rate as his predecessor.

In an election year, even with the economy in a shambles, there’s nothing new about candidates focusing on illegal immigration as a campaign issue, something that can work for or against them depending on whose votes they need. But it’s interesting to see this tradition continuing to the extent it is at a time when the news is pointing in a different direction.

Which message reaching U.S. voters is louder?