Cecilia Muñoz

RECENT POSTS

Who is a ‘low priority’ under DHS deportation guidelines?

Photo by davipt/Flickr (Creative Commons)

After yesterday’s announcement from the Department of Homeland Security that it will review some 300,000 cases of immigrants in the deportation pipeline, potentially sparing many from removal, a Obama administration official posting on the White House Blog linked to “common sense guidelines” that will be applied in deciding who goes and who stays.

An excerpt from what was posted by Cecilia Muñoz, White House intergovernmental affairs director:

So DHS, along with the Department of Justice, will be reviewing the current deportation caseload to clear out low-priority cases on a case-by-case basis and make more room to deport people who have been convicted of crimes or pose a security risk. And they will take steps to keep low-priority cases out of the deportation pipeline in the first place. They will be applying common sense guidelines to make these decisions, like a person’s ties and contributions to the community, their family relationships and military service record.

The link leads back to a June 17 memo from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement director John Morton that urged agency staff to use prosecutorial discretion in the cases of certain immigrants, particularly those without a criminal record, those who arrived here as minors and those who have served or are connected to the military. From the memo, some of the factors to be considered (bold type added):

When weighing whether an exercise of prosecutorial discretion may be warranted for a given alien, ICE officers, agents, and attorneys should consider all relevant factors, including, but not limited to –

• the agency’s civil immigration enforcement priorities

• the person’s length of presence in the United States, with particular consideration given to presence while in lawful status

• the circumstances of the person’s arrival in the United States and the manner of his or her entry, particularly if the alien came to the United States as a young child

• the person’s pursuit of education in the United States, with particular consideration given to those who have graduated from a U.S. high school or have successfully pursued or are pursuing a college or advanced degrees at a legitimate institution of higher education in the United States

• whether the person, or the person’s immediate relative, has served in the U.S. military reserves, or national guard, with particular consideration given to those who served in combat

Continue reading

DHS shift ‘doesn’t provide permanent status for anyone:’ A Twitter Q&A with the White House

Photo by Tom Lohdan/Flickr (Creative Commons)

The Obama administration’s announcement yesterday that it would back off on deporting “low priority” immigrants who don’t present a public safety threat is being cheered by immigrant advocates, but questions remain as to who will benefit and to what extent.

According to the announcement, the deportation cases of immigrants with no criminal records and strong ties to the United States – particularly young people who arrived as children, military veterans and their families – will be reviewed on a case by case basis, and many could be spared deportation. Some people allowed to stay might even qualify for work permits.

But what kind of long-term solution does this represent, if any? Several pertinent questions were brought up yesterday during a live Twitter Q&A chat with White House intergovernmental affairs director Cecilia Muñoz. Among those who joined the discussion was Jose Antonio Vargas, an award-winning journalist who recently revealed his undocumented status. Here’s a Storify(ed) timeline of the chat via the White House Blog.

(And kudos to the White House for posting this while I was tweaking code on a nearly identical Storify timeline, as it saved me some tech headaches.)

Backlash over former NCLR official’s defense of Secure Communities

UPDATE: In a new White House blog post, Muñoz goes on to clarify the White House’s deportation policies in light of an announcement this afternoon from DHS that, if it works as planned, should spare many “low priority” potential deportees. She writes:

Today, they announced that they are strengthening their ability to target criminals even further by making sure they are not focusing our resources on deporting people who are low priorities for deportation. This includes individuals such as young people who were brought to this country as small children, and who know no other home. It also includes individuals such as military veterans and the spouses of active-duty military personnel.

More details soon on what the changes announced entail.

Photo by Corey Moore/KPCC

Protesters in Los Angeles, August 15, 2011

A recent Obama administration defense of the controversial Secure Communities immigration enforcement program has drawn a backlash, but this time, it has as much to do with who provided the defense as what was said.

On Tuesday, the White House’s director of intergovernmental affairs Cecilia Muñoz wrote in the White House blog that the Secure Communities program, which allows the fingerprints of people booked into local jails to be shared with immigration officials, is central to the administration’s immigration enforcement strategy.

Muñoz added that the program is “the primary reason that the deportation statistics show a dramatic increase in the number of criminals deported from the United States.” Along with it she posted these deportation statistics:

  • There was a greater than 70% increase in the deportation of those with criminal records from FY2008 to FY2010, and a decrease of those without criminal records.
  • Today more than half of all removals are people with criminal records.
  • And among those removed who had no criminal records, more than two thirds were either apprehended as they crossed the border, were recent arrivals, or were repeat violators of immigration law, meaning that they had previously been deported.

It’s not an unfamiliar message, along the same lines as what has been stated by other administration officials. Part of what has caused the backlash is that Muñoz is former vice president of the National Council of La Raza, which advocates for immigrant-friendly policy reforms. Muñoz joined Obama’s staff shortly after he was elected in 2008.

Continue reading