AB 540

RECENT POSTS

Über-achiever student? Check. Undocumented? Check.

Photo by Josh Self/Flickr (Creative Commons)

Graduation cap and accoutrements, October 2010

A university student body president and former high school valedictorian, undocumented? Yes, and it shouldn’t surprise anyone.

CSU Fresno’s campus daily, The Collegian, revealed the immigration status of student body president Pedro Ramirez yesterday after contacting him regarding an anonymous tip, an e-mail sent to the daily alleging that Ramirez was serving as president without pay because he was undocumented. While he had not been out in the open about his status, save for with school administrators, Ramirez confirmed it.

From the story:

Ramirez said that ASI administrators were aware that he would not be paid for the ASI position, but he willfully accepted it as a volunteer position.

“For me, it’s an emotional issue,” Ramirez said. “Not a lot of people know that I am undocumented. A lot of people I got to class with…students, faculty, staff and staff administrators think I’m a normal student.”

Ramirez, an AB 540 student, didn’t know of his legal status until his senior year of high school before his graduation.

AB 540 is a California state law that allows eligible undocumented students to pay in-state tuition fees instead of the more costly out-of state fees.

The Los Angeles Times reported this afternoon that Ramirez, who was born in Mexico, has lived in the United States since he was three years old. In what is a fairly common scenario, he only learned from his parents that he wasn’t a U.S. citizen when he was applying to college.

Now that his story is known, Ramirez, a 22-year-old political science major, has come out in support of the DREAM Act, proposed federal legislation that would allow students like him a shot at legal status, along with undocumented youth enlising in the military. A vote is expected at the end of the month.

Ramirez is not the only college student who has achieved high-profile success on campus while lacking legal status, which in spite of AB 540 – just upheld this week by the state Supreme Court – presents other obstacles, including a lack of access to public financial aid.

Another is UCLA Bruin Marching Band drum major David Cho, who has been a vocal proponent of the DREAM Act. In August Cho, a Korean-American who also arrived here as a child, discussed his immigration status on the social-justice blog Citizen Orange as part of collection of posts titled “DREAM Now Series: Letters to Obama.”

Continue reading

Heated reaction to news of court ruling upholding in-state tuition for undocumented students

Photo by CSU Stanislaus Photo/Flickr (Creative Commons)

Students at a commencement ceremony, May 2008

The California Supreme Court today issued a unanimous ruling that allows undocumented students to continue receiving in-state tuition at California colleges and universities, reversing a lower appeals court’s decision. The ruling affirmed that the policy did not conflict with a federal ban on giving undocumented immigrants educational benefits based on residency.

Known as AB 540, the California policy allows for in-state tuition, as opposed to costlier out-of-state tuition, for undocumented students who graduate from and attend California high schools for at least three years. Several other states have similar policies, giving today’s decision some weight beyond the state.

The challenge to AB 540 began with a lawsuit that sought to invalidate the California policy, upheld in the lower court. And in the hours since the state Supreme Court ruling was announced, the reaction to the news has been heated.

A lively debate is running in the comments section beneath the web page for KPCC’s Patt Morrison show, which had a segment on the ruling this afternoon.”Michael from Orange” wrote:

Illegal immigrants and/or their offspring who are not legal US citizens should absolutely not get the same financial eligibility to attend California’s higher education schools as legal US citizens. This stance by our court system is not fair to legal US citizens given the limited resources this state and country are able to devote to our education system at this point in time.

We have to give a clear signal that you don’t get rewarded for braking (sic) our immigration laws to help stop the flow of them over and taking unfair advantage of our system.

To which “Angel” responded:

We allow the illigals (sic) to come and work cleaning our house cutting our grass trimming our lawn but refuse to let their children to higher educations, do we expect the childrens of these illigals (sic) to do the same as their parents did, cleaning the toilets?

Readers who posted comments beneath an L.A. Times story had perhaps slightly better spelling than those on the KPCC site, but were almost unanimously up in arms over the decision. An example from a reader identified as “Outraged:”

I’m assuming the court worked out a reciprocal arrangement where US students will be afforded the same rights and priviledges at Mexican universities. What’s that? No?!? Really? Then why would California do this? Oh I see, self-loathing liberals looking to destroy the United States.

Continue reading