Frontline examines immigrant detention in ‘Lost in Detention’ (Video)

What happened to immigrants held in the nation’s spreading network of detention facilities began getting on the radar toward the end of the last decade, when reports of overcrowding, shoddy health care and detainee deaths began surfacing as a series of lawsuits hit the federal courts.

Slower to make the news, but highly relevant, was the story of the profits being made by private prison companies. Once on the verge of bankruptcy, the private prison industry rebounded after 9/11 as the federal budget for detaining immigrants – people awaiting or fighting their deportation, or held while seeking asylum – skyrocketed, as did the number of detainees held.

Since then, blogs like The Business of Detention and Texas Prison Bid’ness have reported on the money side of locking up immigrants, while advocacy organizations like the Detention Watch Network and Cuéntame have mounted awareness campaigns, often focusing on abuses reported by detainees and other problems.

The detention story has now made it to PBS Frontline, which airs a special documentary tonight called “Lost in Detention.” Frontline worked with the American University School of Communication’s  Investigative Reporting Workshop. From the workshop’s website, a little of the reporting backstory:

The Workshop requested data going back a decade about people held by the U.S. government for deportation, including detainee names, when and where individuals were booked in and booked out of detention, and what prompted their arrest.  We asked for this information in several Freedom of Information Act requests to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, part of the Department of Homeland Security, one of the nation’s largest, federal, law-enforcement agencies.

What arrived at our doorstep in 2009 was a mess of confusing and incomplete information that didn’t help us answer our original questions.  After months of trying to pry data from the agency about those being detained, it was clear that the government didn’t always know where the detainees were held, how long they were detained, or how much they paid to house and feed them. In fact, our records showed that in some cases officials might not have known whether detainees were actually in custody or even if they were dead or alive.

It’s been two years since the Obama administration announced an overhaul of the detention system, including plans to build less jail-like facilities. But a recent report released by the international advocacy group Human Rights First found that many problems have persisted, and that most immigrant detainees, who are not being held for crimes, are still being housed in what are essentially prisons.

The PBS Frontline documentary is one of two airing tonight that address the private prison industry. While not focused on immigrant detention, a CNBC documentary tonight called “Billions Behind Bars: Inside America’s Prison Industry” will explore how private jailers profit.

  • Special K

    For far too many decades, by failure to enforce rules that
    make illegal immigration illegal the federal government has sent a message to
    immigrants guilty of illegal trespassing indicating that “mi casa es su
    casa.” Officials at the state level (including Arizona, Oklahoma, Georgia
    and most recently, Alabama) have begun to make it clear to illegal residents
    that “Nuestra casa no es su casa, and trespassers will be not be
    tolerated”.

     

    Apparently trespassers in Alabama, seeing the handwriting on the wall,
    have begun to pack up and leave. Just think how salutary the effects of a
    national law modeled on the Alabama
    law, and mandating that local law enforcement participate in its faithful
    execution, would be in bringing about a voluntary reduction in the size of the
    nation’s currently illegally resident sub-population.

    In attempting to portray illegal immigrants as victims, various groups and media outlets are blind to the fact that by virtue of their having taken up illegal residence in the U.S. the individuals involved are ipso facto responsible for any subsequent inconveniences they may experience while residing here illegally. Self-deportation would be a sure fire way to avoid problems stemming from being in this country illegally.

    But those who look forward to viewing this TV program probably endorse “mi casa es su casa” as national policy.

  • Peggy

    Be that as it may, at least if you were king, Mr. Special K, we will soon have $5.00 tomatos, and Red Delicious at  $7.00/lb thanks to the environment of hostility in the state policies that you cite.. And corn – corn is in our gas, in our pet foods, the sweetener for thousands of products, and in the cow and pig slop.
    But, besides all those practical considerations – did you even watch the Frontline episode? I get the feeling that youu did not even watch it.

  • GerCard

    I am not Hispanic, and I have been in the US legally for 16 years, 6 years of college and working for 10, when ICE sent me a letter telling me that I have been illegal for 2 years. ICE held my file for a whole year, no reasons offered. I am still waiting for my court date so I can “leave legally”. My savings are depleted, I have not worked since then. I cannot legally drive, or move on with my life. No income, living on loan. 

    ICE does not know what USCIS is doing, and USCIS cannot get my file back from ICE for “due processing”. If Frontline had dug deeper, they would find a lot of cases like mine, I am sure. We would not see justice, since the accusers are “untouchable” and we have no recourse. 

    I am sorry, Homeland Security is above the law, even senators that I have sought help from could not get me answers. Justice in America? That is no available when economy is bad. I have no sympathy for illegal immigrants, but I am beginning to develop some for them if things like this can happen to legal aliens.

  • Mashaburke

    In another 10-15 years all
    the today’s kids of undocumented parents will turn 18. They will be able
    to vote, they will be able to bring their deported parents back, as
    there no visa limits for immediate family members of American citizens.
    Is it realy smart to spend all the money to deport people today just to
    get them back in 10-15 years? Is it realy smart to put another 4 500
    000 American citizen children in foster care after deporting their
    parents? American taxpayers will have to pay to deport parents of 4 500
    000 American citizen children. Then they will have to pay to feed,
    cloth, house and educate 4 500 000 American citizen children, provide
    them with medical care for the next 10-15 years. Then all the deported
    parents will be back, applying for SSI and welfare based on
    physiological depression triggered by deportation and separation from
    their children and spouses for decades. There probably will be some kind
    of compensation from the Government like American Japanese got for
    being detained in camps during World War Two. What is more humane and
    more beneficial for the economy: spend trillions of dollars on
    deportations and social services only to get all the deportees back in
    15 years, or stop the deportations and Reform the Immigration system?
    Bringing people from the shadows will strengthen the consumer base and
    jump start the economy. It had always happened in the past.

  • Lalo

    Yes!  Stop the immigrants at the border but make sure meat stays at the same price, that vegetables are available year round, that our homes get cleaned and our children are cared for, that our yards get trimmed and worked on, that construction goes on and that our roofs are repaired.  Everyone knows that they pay nothing in the way of sales and property taxes.